<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">+1.<div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On 27 Mar 2009, at 1:16 AM, Ceki Gulcu wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>Hello all,<br><br>SLF4J users have been asking for varags support for a long time. See<br><a href="http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31">http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31</a> for more details. The<br>plan is to add varags support in SLF4J version 1.6 to be released later<br>this year, possibly in October 2009.<br><br>The idea is extremely simple. We would replace methods such as:<br><br> // in current API<br> public void debug(String msgFormat, Object[] argArray);<br><br>with:<br><br> // proposed API for SLF4J 1.6.0<br> public void debug(String msgFormat, Object... arg);<br><br>Interestingly enough, the proposed change is perfectly compatible with<br>existing code. In particular, code compiled against SLF4J 1.5.6 or<br>earlier will run fine against SLF4J 1.6.0 and vice versa, that is<br>client code compiled with SLF4J 1.6.0 will run fine with SLF4J 1.5.6<br>and earlier.<br><br>The only problem is that the varargs notation requires JDK 1.5. Thus,<br>we are faced with the question of requiring JDK 1.5 instead of JDK<br>1.3 in SLF4J.<br><br>Do you accept SLF4J dropping JDK 1.3 compatibility and require JDK 1.5<br>instead? If you respond, please do so on the user@slf4j mailing list.<br><br>This poll is open for 3 months starting from today, March the 26th of<br>2009.<br><br>Many thanks in advance for your feedback.<br><br>-- <br>Ceki Gülcü<br>Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.<br><a href="http://logback.qos.ch">http://logback.qos.ch</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>user mailing list<br><a href="mailto:user@slf4j.org">user@slf4j.org</a><br>http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>