Agreed. I was thinking as400 was coming here. That would have been enough to tip the scale as I'd imagine that would have a bit of stuff in it.<br><br>Ralph<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Ceki Gulcu <span dir="ltr"><listid@qos.ch></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
ralph.goers @<a href="http://dslextreme.com" target="_blank">dslextreme.com</a> wrote (on logback-dev mailing list):<br>
> I am starting to wonder if ext should be a root directory for some<br>
> subprojects. For example, AOP could be one subproject, utils another,<br>
> AS400 a third. Then we wouldn't need to make the dependencies optional,<br>
> but it will lead to more jars.<br>
<br>
I think splitting slf4j-ext is a good idea. However, I also think it might be<br>
too soon. Let us wait until the benefits outweigh the costs.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Ceki Gülcü<br>
Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.<br>
<a href="http://logback.qos.ch" target="_blank">http://logback.qos.ch</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:dev@slf4j.org">dev@slf4j.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev" target="_blank">http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>