<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid6.0.3.0.0.20050827134648.034b1300@torino"
type="cite">Would you prefer Markers to be dropped in the next version
of SLF4J?
<br>
</blockquote>
I've just returned from holidays and have a million emails! (Not
literally, thank goodness.)<br>
So, to keep it brief, my opinion is that, if SLF4J is true to its
intention "to serve as a <i><b>simple</b></i> façade for various
logging APIs", Markers would be outside the scope, as I believe they
push the façade beyond "simple".<br>
<br>
I don't want to be "the guy that made us drop Markers". <span
class="moz-smiley-s1"><span> :-) </span></span><br>
I think Markers are a bit complex and hence beyond the stated goal of
SLF4J, but their existence wouldn't cause me to stop providing SLF4J
support for Simple Log.<br>
If you dropped them, I would think that SLF4J was better for it, but I
wouldn't think it is bad if they stay.<br>
<br>
Graham.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>