<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">I absolutely agree that LGPL or GPL+classpath are valid and reasonable
licenses... it just makes it a little less business friendly.<br><br>Does the GPL+classpath allow for writing extensions and plugins for logback that I can license as a non-copyleft license (apache /BSD/X11 or closed source)?<br><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br>From: Ceki Gulcu <listid@qos.ch><br>To: logback users list <logback-user@qos.ch><br>Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2008 12:42:41 PM<br>Subject: Re: [logback-user] GPL+Classpath exception<br><br>
Logback is related to log4j, but it is not an Apache project. The difference in <br>license is one way to get the point across. Moreover, LGPL or GPL+classpath <br>exception are both valid and reasonable licenses for libraries such as logback.<br><br>Arthur Blake wrote:<br>> I'm just curious... why did you decide not to use the Apache license for <br>> logback... ? <br>-- <br>Ceki Gülcü<br><a target="_blank" href="http://QOS.ch">QOS.ch</a> is looking to hire talented developers in Switzerland. If<br>interested, please contact c e k i @ q o s . c h<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Logback-user mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Logback-user@qos.ch" href="mailto:Logback-user@qos.ch">Logback-user@qos.ch</a><br><a href="http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user" target="_blank">http://qos.ch/mailman/listinfo/logback-user</a><br></div><br></div></div><br>
<hr size=1>You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=47523/*http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com">one month of Blockbuster Total Access</a>, No Cost.</body></html>