<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"><HTML DIR=ltr><HEAD><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"></HEAD><BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText30627 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT>Hi,</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>lgoback seems to solve some problems that log4j has, but I did not
yet find the answer to my most pressign question: Does logback handle multiple
configurations in a controllable manner?</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>The crucial problem with log4j was its great propularity not only
with application developers but also with library developers that sometimes
packed an log4j confguration file into their jars.</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>So in almost every project it could happen that one did configure
log4j and only get strange or even no output because ther is some other log4j
configration overriding the one intended by oneself.</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>If logback improves this behavior of log4j I'd be switching
immediately with flying colors!</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>Regards,</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>jens</DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr> </DIV></DIV><br><br>
<P align=center><FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff">This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.</FONT></A></P>
</body></HTML>